![]() ![]() ![]() Sharing code of external GUIs, with potential game decisive move selection, time allocation and draw claiming, by multiple engines in official tournaments is a heavily discussed topic. These game interacting features of the external GUI application in conjunction with certain protocols such as UCI by far exceeds what a pure chess user interface was initially designed for - controller and view only, enter legal moves and render the state of the game. The external GUI application constitutes the MVC view and controller, and more or less even parts of a (redundant) game model (or even multi-game model), to make the GUI aware of its own game states to even make decisions on behalf of the engine, such as move selection from opening books and endgame tablebases, draw claims and offers and to finally declare the game over. Today, most programmers rely on external event driven GUI applications using standard streams or pipelines to communicate with the GUI via protocols such as the Chess Engine Communication Protocol or the Universal Chess Interface. The controller receives input from various sources and devices, such as keyboard, mouse, serial port and internet socket, and initiates a response by making calls on model objects. The view displays the game notation, a list of moves, and likely the board with the current position, suitable for interaction inside a user interface. The model and controller implement a finite-state machine which controls the game, its states, state transitions and actions considering various modes. The game model represents the domain-specific data on which the application operates - Inside a chess program, the information about the initial position and the game record to reproduce the current positions, likely subject of search or pondering during game play. game administration, time management and searching a move inside a chess program from input and presentation. The chess program and its user interface can be interpreted as a Model–view–controller (MVC), an architectural pattern that isolates business logic f.i. There may be other modes than pure game playing, for instance to replay and analyze a game, allowing the user to click and drag the moves of the game notation move list, which needs appropriate indication and ergonomic control. The sequential nature of the game of chess, along with the both fundamental states of a chess engine while playing a game, that is calculating a move and pondering, should be appropriately indicated by the GUI, for instance to allow the interaction of entering moves only for the opponent side while pondering. Chris Daly interacting with Daly CP, 1970 on an IDIIOM Playing Chess
0 Comments
![]() Like automation, integration is critical for engagement tools. Automated check-ins, customized to an individual’s start date, keep the onboarding process running smoothly. In my experience onboarding hundreds of employees in businesses of types and sizes, the most important automation feature is integration with employee onboarding systems. We only select tools that support a scheduled cadence for collecting employee feedback and seamless automation processes that disseminate that information to HR teams and execs through email and/or dashboards. No one has time for an employee engagement tool that doesn't have built-in automation! This allows HR teams to see how engaged or not each part of the organization is. It follows that the best tools know what to do with that engagement data! We love analytics dashboards that provide meaningful insights, letting you slice, dice, and serve up info by office, function, or even demographic. We chose tools that wove this engagement seamlessly into everyday tools like Slack, MS Teams, and email. We selected platforms that enable engagement by making it easy for employees to share feedback, log complaints, take surveys, and generally share their thoughts. These platforms should be as friendly and approachable as they are powerfully analytical. Here’s the gist: in addition to doing full-on product demos with each vendor, we use a mix of user research, expert feedback, and in-house knowledge to determine which products are the best.įor this list in particular, we assessed each platform for the features most important for employee engagement software: the ability to encourage and monitor employee engagement, automation features, ease of integration, and ROI.Įncourage and monitor employee engagement For an in-depth look at how we do that, read this article about our editorial guidelines. Our selection criteria for this best-of list is based on what we believe is best for our readers. |