![]() It's not the largest screen around, but it's more than enough for quick texts and using your phone more like a phone.īetter yet, the price is right in the sweet spot for most reviewers, making it an excellent value for those experiencing sticker shock from the prices of modern smart flip phones.īest Basic Candybar Phone for Most Users, Best Budget-Friendly Candybar Phone ![]() It offers a few apps (such as navigation, email, and YouTube) while not loading you down with endless options and notifications. If you're looking for a solid middle ground between ultra-basic flip phones and the newer smart flip phones, the Alcatel Go Flip 4 is an excellent option. Interested in more phones? See a list of phones I own here.Best Basic Flip Phone for Most Users, Best Flip Phone for Kids, Best Budget-Friendly Flip Phone Where can I get one?īoth Ebay and Amazon have second-hand and refurbished models. Many of the housings did not stand up to much punishment and as a result many second-hand versions are worn, so there would be a premium for those in good condition. However, it remains a real ‘retro’ handset, perhaps by virtue of its very small size. The Nokia 6100 was a popular handset, if not as popular as many of the better known ones. The battery switched from the BLD-3 to a smaller capacity BL-4C which slightly reduced standby and talk-times although both were still much above that of today’s generation of smartphones.This was a handy feature to have in days where phones could not do much else. ![]() For some unknown reason, the radio app was left off the phone.Image support was via an external camera, although many phones were beginning to have this feature integrated.The screen was the same in both size and colours. The phone offered no improvements over the older models.The phone also was also at a discount to the Nokia 7210 and Nokia 7250.The phone also added support for Java applets. The phone also features the same familiar Nokia operating system, making it easy for people to upgrade.The phone came in an arguably more sensible design than the Nokia 7210 and offered the same specification and ability to change covers.Compared to the Nokia 7210 the size difference was not noticeable, but it was smaller and lighter. The size of the phone was small and a direct improvement over earlier models because of the colour screen.Ultimately, the more angular and unusual keypad designs of the Nokia phones did not win out, and although we did see elements of the 6100 keypad in future models the next main candybar 6-series release was the Nokia 6230 which had a standard more functional design. There were a few phones quite similar to the Nokia 6100 at the time of its release, most notably the Nokia 6610, although at 74g the Nokia 6100 was one of the lightest, weighing less than both the Nokia 8210 and Nokia 8310. It also suffered a degree of going out of date quite quickly, as the Nokia 7250 followed on its heels very quickly and featured a camera, something that was coming into fashion at the time. So with many Nokia 7210 users still less than 1 year inside their contracts and hence unavailable for upgrade, the Nokia 6100 did not have the first mover advantage. By contrast, there were not too many improvements in the Nokia 6100. This offered a great jump for many older Nokia users – going from a mono phone such as the Nokia 8310 or Nokia 3510 to a colour screen model. Unfortunate because it followed less than a year of a really popular handset – the Nokia 7210. Nokia 6100 Review: The Nokia 6100 was released perhaps at an unfortunate time, at the end of 2002.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |